ReCAP Maintenance Reports

Daily

  • Failures
  • Non-Failures

Weekly

Monthly

  • Collection Agency
  • Missing In Transit Stats
  • Orphan Stats
  • Patron Group Population Stats
  • Proc Stats
  • Transfer Schedule

Annual

Accession Report

What are Accession Reports?

Every week CUL retrieves a file from LAS database at ReCAP documenting the week's accessions.  LITO staff use this report to update CLIO locations and add the request button in the OPAC.  The Accession Report categorizes irregularities resulting from the CLIO update.  See below for complete list of problem categories.

Copies of the Accession Report are emailed to core staff.  Hard copy of categorized reports is printed for MRP staff with scannable barcodes.  MRP staff resolve problems and complete CLIO update.

Problem Categories on Accession Reports

  • BADLOC (Bad Location): Item with CLIO location not authorized for offsite transfer or mis-match between holdings and item record CLIO location.  MRP staff manually changes CLIO locations from encoding pattern xxx to off,xxx.
  • TEMP LOCATION: Item with encoding in any of the three Temp. fields in the Voyager item record.
  • CHECKED OUT: Item that have an active charge to a status patron (pseudopatron).  This category is mainly books processed by BSP (Binding and Shelf Preparation).  Regular, charged ReCAP returns are resolved by LITO staff during a weekly reconciliation.
  • IN TRANSIT: Item discharged from a non-owning Voyager Circulation happening location result in In Transit status.
  • SUPPRESSED: BIBL or HLDG record is currently suppressed.  Depending on the nature of the record, it may be unsuppressed.  Under- or unprocessed collections retain suppression to control access.  Duplicate serial runs also remain suppressed.
  • INACTIVE: Only one barcode in an ITEM record can be "Acitive."  If the offsite barcode is "Inactive" staff manually make it "Active."
  • DUPLICATE: Identical offsite barcode was assigned to two separate item records.  Item must be recalled to determine correct barcode assignment.
  • LOST/SYSTEM APPLIED BARCODES: Item status set to "Lost".  Once status is removed the item is immediately available for request.

Example Accession Report

Accession2

Example pictured to the right, excluding problem categories. Details listed below.

TODAY'S FILE IS recap.d20120106.d20120112: Date range for current accession report.

  • new records read: Total number of items that were accessioned by ReCAP during period
  • old not found records read: Items that are currently accessioned in LAS but not entered in CLIO
  • total records read: Total number of items that were accessioned by ReCAP during period plus all previously not found records
  • bad locations: Items is BADLOC problem category
  • records not found: Total not found after report was run. Commonly referred to as orphan barcodes and require staff resolution
  • not found were RS records: Added at MRP's request
  • have temp locations: Items in TEMP LOCATION problem category.
  • already have offsite locations: Items that were already assigned off,xxx locations before transfer. Typically new serial issues added to title already off-site
  • barcodes with lost status: Items found with "Lost" Item Status (may or may not have an active charge)

BILO (BIND/INTR/LABL Overdue) Report

BILO1

Quarterly Overdue Lists include all items charged to a status patrons of type: xxxBINDxxx (Binding), xxxINTRxxx (In Transit) or xxxLABLxxx (Labelling).  See DCMM-180 for more information.

"Offsite" report includes all items with CLIO locations xxx4off and off,xxx.  It is monitored by the ReCAP Coordinator. 

CLIO location xxx4off indicates that the item is a new acquisition and may be queued for transfer to ReCAP (84.1% of Feb 2010 report).  Once successfully transfered and accessioned, barcodes appear on the weekly Accession Report for MRP staff to discharge (see section CHECKED OUT).  Estimated timeframe for accession at ReCAP is 2-4 weeks after both charge and physical transfer.  Items charged for more than 12 months will be charged to a ReCAP Missing status patron.

CLIO location off,xxx indicates that the item is a new serial acquisition queued for transfer or that the item has been identified for preservation, re-binding or labelling (15.9% of Feb 2010 report).  Items charged for more than 12 months will be charged to a ReCAP Missing status patron.

Items may be currently staged for transfer, in transit or at ReCAP waiting for processing.  Since staff reduction at ReCAP in June 2009, the timeframe between physical transfer and accession has lengthened.  In October/November 2010 the transfer time for new acquisitions lengthened considerably, caused by a shortage of wooden carts available to BSP staff.

N.B. Because of the extended timeframe for the routine transfer of items to ReCAP compared to on campus shelving, a new composit Offsite report was created in November 2009 (discussed at the September 2009 meeting of CCMSCC).  In mid-2011 the timeline returned to normal, accessioning 2-4 weeks post-transfer.

Procedure for resolution

Barcodes that have been charged to a BILO status patron for more than 12 months are charged to one of two status patrons: RCPMISS001 or RCPMISS002.

  • Correct any obviously mis-scanned barcodes, check LAS to verify it is IN
  • Onsite barcodes are likely orphans; check each one to see if it there are two ITEM records for same volume.  If second ITEM is at ReCAP, discharge and delete the "ghost" ITEM
  • Check Hierarchy for irregularities and request volumes as needed
  • Batch query LAS status of unresolved barcodes
  • RCPMISS001 is used for all items that are currently NOT ON FILE at ReCAP (have not been accessioned)
  • RCPMISS002 is used for all items that are currently OUT at ReCAP (accessioned and retrieved)
  • If barcode status is DELETED, discharge item

It is not worthwhile conducting shelf search for items on BILO report.  Experiement search in Fall 2011 found no books.

If an item charged to either status patron is accessioned or returned, it will be automatically discharged by MRP as part of the weekly Accession Report.  If not accessioned or returned, items will flow onto departmental NRTN reports to be searched, replaced or withdrawn.

  Feb 2010
May 2010
Aug 2010
Nov 2010
Feb 2011
May 2011
Aug 2011
Nov 2011 Feb 2012 May 2012 Aug 2012 Nov 2012 Feb 2013 May 2013 Aug 2013 Nov 2013
Total (Year+) 872 (108)
208 (13) 351 (45) 540 (28) 1614 (9) 630 (29) 452 (76) 488 (104) 366 (92) 353 (57) 160 (18) 310 (14) 188 (27) 154 (18) 197 (30) 206 (29)
Charged to RCPMISS001 unknown unknown
22 17 6 29 56 100 81 53 12 12 23 14 23 27
Charged to RCPMISS002 unknown
unknown
23 11 3 0 20 4 11 4 1 2 4 4 7 2

Claim Returns

Claim returns are referred to the ReCAP Coordinator by department circulation staff.  All are logged in an .xlsx file.  On a quarterly basis query the status of all outstanding claim returns.  If the item has been returned to ReCAP, alert the reporting staff member.

  Aug 2013 Nov 2013
Outstanding Claim Returns 21 20

Exception Reports

1. Missing In Transit

When an item is discharged from a non-owning happening location it is assigned status "In Transit Discharged."  If it is not discharged from the owning happening location after 7 days, it is considered missing and included on this report.  Only items with Perm Loc off,xxx will appear on this report.  The number of items on this report fluctuates from day to day.

The number of items on this report depends on one of three factors: 1) CUL staff discharging from the correct happening location, 2) timely resolution of the Reconciliation Report, and 3) timely check-in of returns by ReCAP staff.

Statistics are compiled monthly to monitor overall trends and once annually longstanding (12+ months) items are charged to Missing.  An indication of a systematic problem is a monthly report of 100+ persisting titles.  Longstanding items should be evaluated on title-by-title basis before charging.

Most items are routinely resolved every Friday as part of the Reconciliation Report.  They were accidentally, improperly discharged at time of return or in processing before transfer.

Reserve books may be improperly discharged.  Books can be found on shelf but OPAC display indicates unavailability.  A new column for Temp. Loc. was added to the report on 10/26/2011 to quickly identify Reserve books with location xxx,res. Alert relevant Reserve desk staff to verify and discharge.

Notes:

Report was revised on 1/20/2012.  Only Monday report had included all happening locations and included many duplicate entries.  Both issues resolved by eo33.

Periodically check LAS status by batch file, some new accessions are not discharged properly. 

Items that persist on this report longer than six months can be charged to RCPMISS002.

Problem categories and resolutions:

 

Once annually charge items to RCPMISS002 that have been In Transit for more than 12 months.

  FY13 FY14 FY15
Charged to RCPMISS002 1    

2. Transaction Related Exceptions

tk

3. Item Related Exceptions

tk

Item Status Report

Item Status can affect both perception and agency of patron access to Offsite collections. 

Several Item Status categories were not accounted for in either current practice or automated systems that apply to ReCAP processing.  The Item Status Report was created to identify and resolve: Withdrawn, Missing, In Process, Cataloging Review, Circulation Review and At Bindery.  Other statuses are used for record keeping (Damaged) or are resolved through existing procedures (Lost on the NRTN and In Transit on the Reconciliation).

More information about Item Status in Voyager may be found in DCMM (documentation still un-published in draft phase).

  At Bindery Cat Review Circ Review Claims Returned In Process Missing Withdrawn
Jan 2011 10 135 27 0 17 34 111
May 2011 10 111 13 0 4 14 23
July 2011 6 20 11 0 0 3 3
Nov 2011 5 55 9 0 0 10 79
Feb 2012 6 57 8 0 0 9 20
Aug 2012 24
81 43 0 0 22 37
Nov 2012 12 20 21 0 0 8 20
Feb 2013 6 43 11 0 0 31 19
May 2013 9 22 16 0 0 18 27
Aug 2013 4 34 18 0 0 5 20
Nov 2013 6 65 54 0 0 8 39

Each status must be removed individually.  Pick and Scan functionality in Voyager can not be used because Damaged Item Status is used for record keeping and must be retained.

Resolve on quarterly basis:

  • At Bindery: Remove status.  Check for other irregularities to Voyager record structure.  (Obsolete practice at HSL and East Asian)
  • Cataloging Review: Remove status.  Verify record is not OTF.  Retrieve OTFs for processing.  (Butler Circ current practice is that only OTFs are assigned this status)
  • Circulation Review: Remove status.  Check for department specific Notes in ITEM Record, route as appropriate.  (Set by HSL and department staff to alert that transitional Temp. Loc. must be removed (e.g. sci2hsl).  HSL has used as reminder to send book to bindery.  Butler Circ will typically place Hold, not assign this status.)
  • Claims Returned:
  • In Process: Remove status.  Most often applied accidentally during fragile processing.
  • Missing: Remove status and unsuppress as appropriate.
  • Withdrawn: Remove status and unsuppress as appropriate.

Mis-Shelved On Campus Report

Purpose: Used to identify ReCAP books potentially mis-shelved on campus after circ return.

Background: CUL staff occassionally mis-shelve Offsite collections on campus instead of returning them to ReCAP.  All ReCAP items have a barcode placed in the top left corner of the front cover.  To assist with identification, incoming deliveries have a pink RECAP sticker applied to the spine or front cover by circulation staff.  The pink sticker distinguishes requests from books in process for new accession

Shelving mistakes occur in low quantities, typically when the pink sticker is not applied to the spine.  In 2008 CUL staff reported to the ReCAP Coordinator that ReCAP books had been found mis-shelved on campus.  In Spring 2009 a library school intern was assigned to systematically identify and resolve mis-shelvings.  From the initial project developed a report and procedure to find missing books.

It's recommended that a search be conducted once a year.  All missing books may be charged to status patron RCPMISS003.

Procedure:  Once annually generate a report identifying candidate barcodes.  Over 2-3 months perform a sequence of LAS status queries to narrow down candidates to search.  Bibliographic data from Voyager is added to aid searching. 

An actionable report can not be generated until several weeks after initial query.  Many items are in-transit and must be given time to arrive at their destination, whether they are being delivered to campus or returning to ReCAP.

Steps to generate search list:

  1. Identify candidate barcodes: Contact LITO to run a report of barcodes that meet three criteria: a) OUT status at ReCAP, b) no active charge in CLIO and c) ITEM record does not have a Temp. Loc. (i.e. not on Reserve).  Request as standard report witte@bearberry:~/offsite.d/zack/zackrpt3.  Output comes in email text that must be reformatted in an MS Excel worksheet.  Includes four categories of data: a) barcode, b) customer code, c) retrieval date and d) days OUT from ReCAP.  This report includes items in-transit to and from ReCAP.  Given time, most of these barcodes will either be refiled at ReCAP or charged in Voyager.
  2. Obtain granular data for barcodes: Contact LITO to add CLIO data to the set of barcodes.  Data categories to add include: a) CLIO location, b) Title, c) active charge, d) suppressed HLDG and e) call number.  Output is a MS Excel  file that includes columnar data.  Exclude all items with an active charge or suppressed.  Resolve incomplete withdrawals. 
  3. (Re)Query the status of barcode file: Contact LITO to batch query the current status of the barcodes.  Send barcode list as a .txt file.  Update list by excluding barcodes that do not have status Out on Ret from ReCAP.  Retain only barcodes with Out status for the report.  Retain data categories: barcode, customer code, status and date.  Re-query at least two times.
  4. Onsite shelving search: Issue departmental reports for onsite shelving search.  Ignore non-print collections.  Charge not found books to RCPMISS003.
  5. Process flows to NRTN Report: If an item is returned to ReCAP, it will be automatically discharged and become accessible.  If the book remains charged to Missing it will flow onto the NRTN Report.  Department libraries (re)search on shelf for items.  If not found they are replaced or withdrawn according to department practice.
Report Statistics              
FY13              

NRTN

NRTN is an abbreviation of "Not Returned."  Quarterly NRTN reports list items with "Lost" Item Status.  They are generated in four sections: Search, Selector, Withdraw, and Retrospective.  All can be found online.  Offsite collections appear on both the Offsite reports and department reports.

The primary reasons that offsite collections become lost are:

  • Overdue to patron
  • "Lost" status not cleared after return at Circulation
  • Item part of Preservation or BSP backlog
  • Multi-media item with obsolete, post-binding item record

Each CUL department handles NRTN reports differently according to local search routine.  See DCMM-244, DCM-246 and DCMM-248 for more information.

Resolution of both current and restrospective NRTN reports involves checking the current status of barcode in LAS database.  Status query is ReCAP equivalent of a shelf search.  The goal is to remove "Lost" status whenever appropriate.  All items should ideally be searched on campus at the owning library.

It is important to maintain integrity of verified Offsite collections.  If an item has LAS status NOT ON FILE, change the CLIO location from off,xxx to xxx4off.  All items that have status OUT should already be charged to a patron or status patron.  Patron charges (and fines) must be left in place.  Resolution of status patron charges should be done in consultation with department staff.

Small quantities of new accessions with "Lost" Item Status are now identified and resolved weekly on the Accession Report.   "Lost" Item Status may date back to 1999.  "Lost" Item Status prevents request.

Resolutions:

  • IN or REF : Remove Lost status
  • NOT ON FILE : delete ITEM or flip location as appropriate
  • OUT : no action
  • PWI or PWD : no action

Table 1: Search, Selector and Withdrawal report totals

Date Search Selector Withdraw Retrospective
November 2013 110 (10)
22 (7)
187 (166)
609 (212)
August 2013 29 (13)
202 (171)
26 (5)
608 (246)
May 2013 217 (181) 27 (5) 77 (34) 636 (309)
January 2013 47 (8) 86 (38) 25 (17) 644 (226)
October 2012 91 (39)
31 (23)
114 (84)
542 (226)
July 2012 34 (25) 135 (96) 207 (136) 306 (114)
April 2012 168 (104) 218 (138) 80 (15) 326 (106)
January 2012 233 (140)
93 (17) 34 (26) 449 (123)
October 2011 123 (28) 39 (32) 232 (106) 263 (55)
July 2011 110 (33) 251 (118) 108 (80) 190
April 2011 288 (143) 151 (91) 118 (101) 182
January 2011 165 (98) 124 (107) 32 (20) 166
October 2010 137 (111) 34 (21) 27 (4) 158
July 2010 40 (27) 30 (3) 29 (9)  
April 2010 42 (3) 31 (9) 39 (6)  
January 2010 36 (10) 43 (7) 24 (7)  
October 2009 52 (8) 27 (8) 62 (6)  

Each quarter the first reports are archived and remain stable.  The Retrospective report is refreshed.

Columns summarize two pieces of data: total items on list and total items charged to a status patron (in parentheses). Charges to study carrels are counted as regular patrons.

Staff use status patrons to push items onto the NRTN report.  Offsite collections are frequently mis-shelved on campus.  Regular department procedure involves search of campus shelving.  The increase in status patron charges beginning in July 2010 represents charges placed from BILO and Mis-Shelved On Campus reports.

Each month the retrospective report for Offsite collections changes.  Items may move onto the report a) because an item with location off,xxx has progressed through the Search, Selector and Withdrawal reports or b) because a "Lost" item with location xxx flips to off,xxx.

Items that have been Permanently Withdrawn should maintain off,xxx CLIO location.  Although these items have "Lost" Item Status they have associated fines that would be erased if discharged.  If permw'd items resurface, they must be sent to ReCAP as new accessions.

On-Campus CLIO Location

reportemail1

Run monthly as part of the accession data updates.  Identifies all items that are accessioned at ReCAP that do not have offsite CLIO locations (off,xxx).  It is necessary to check current status in LAS to determine solution.  Some cases will require retrieval from ReCAP.

  • Two offsite barcodes assigned to single ITEM record
  • Same offsite barcode assigned to two ITEM records
  • BADLOC not resolved as part of Accession Report
  • Staff processing error (ex post facto encoding)

Monthly e-mail includes barcode numbers and CLIO locations.

Large quantity of items are Astrophysics books (temporarily) relocated to Math with CLIO location phy,msci in August 2011.  These are noted in parentheses on the statistics table below.

On-Campus CLIO Location
Jan 2012 Mar 2012 May 2012 July 2012 Aug 2012 Sept 2012 May 2013 June 2013 Aug 2013 Nov 2013
Items 11 738 (650) 718 (650) 680 (650) 671 (650) 668 (650) 721 (650) 676 (650) 690 (650) 663 (650)

Orphan Barcodes

OrphanStats1402

An orphan barcode is any offsite barcode that is active in the LAS database but not present in Voyager.  They are books genuinely lost in ReCAP.

Responsibility for the lack or loss of data lies entirely with Columiba Libraries staff, not ReCAP.  Resolution is resource-heavy and complicated and can only be completed with book-in-hand.  Orphans include all collections and sub-collections, both general and special collections. 

Orphans barcodes are the largest category of "missing" collections.  At the highest point there were 41,555 orphans in November 2008.  As of March 2012, 29,612 remained.  In July 2013 about 5,000 additional orphans were discovered, previously overlooked by staff.  Many of these were a result of incomplete withdrawal in the past.

Orphan barcodes are an endemic part of ReCAP processing.  New accessions are currently orphaned at a rate of roughly 0.35%.  These are considered to be "born orphan."  There are many causes, usually difficult to discern case-by-case.

Identification and resolution began in late 2008.

Processing orphans presents many challenges.  Chief among them the diversity of collections at ReCAP.  Besides customer code there is nothing to identify ownership of books by department library.  Each sub-collection presents complications stemming from the history of the collection, language, classification, and method of processing.

Orphan Barcode Project

In September 2012 a large-scale project was designed to resolve outstanding orphan barcoces.  An Action Plan (.docx) was created to detail how 16,715 CU and CR barcodes will be completed over three years by student worker staff.  Approximately 25 barcodes will be retrieved from ReCAP per business day until the end of December 2015.

For more information see related project documentation:

Other customer codes will be resolved by deparment staff: AD, AR, AV, HR, HS, RS and UA.

Orphans by Customer Code
Project Barcodes AD
AR AV BS
CM CR
CU EA EV GC HR
HS HX MR OH RH RS UA
Sept 2012 16,715 3 15
5
7,869
5 496
16,219       200
444   0 291 2,767 95 21
Dec 2012 15,884 0 19 5 7,869 5 496 15,388   156   200 93   4 291 2,822 43 0
Mar 2013 15,303 1 15 5 7,867 5 496 14,807   132   160 26   8 291 2,819 362 0
May 2013 14,622 1 16 5 7,867 5 496 14,126   110   162 5   9 291 2,826 71 0
Aug 2013 14,794 3 149 9 7,876 6 16 14,778       2,768 29   13 291 2,802 583 0
Nov 2013 14,102 3 143 8 7,864 0 19 14,083 39 143 121 2,810
35 8 2 291 2,813 616 0
Feb 2014 14,040 0 151 8 7,864 18 18 14,022 38 129 121 2,964 52 8 2 291 2845 531 0

New Orphans

OrphanReport1

There has been an ongoing project since June 2011 to resolve all "new" orphans.  Approximately 0.35% of new, non-RBML accessions are born orphan per week.

Two weekly reports list both new and retropective orphans.  The report of new orphans covers all items accessioned during the past week.  Immediate action is taken by the ReCAP Coordinator to request and resolve all non-RBML barcodes. 

RBML staff enter barcodes in Voyager from hard-copy reports.  There is often a short delay before data input.  Primary concern for new orphans is non-RBML collections.  RBML orphans are expected to resolve themselves.

The retrospective report is large.  It may change weekly.  If staff delete a barcode of an existing accession, it flows onto this report.

 

At right is an excerpt from the new orphan report.  It is a list of barcodes followed by category summaries.  Categories correspond to those in the weekly Accession Report

  • records read: Total number of items that were accessioned by ReCAP during period
  • records not found: Total not found after report was run = orphans
  • records found: Accessions minus orphans

Avery Orphans

Spring 2009 intern project to explore resolving orphan barcodes systematically. 

Documentation: Flowchart (.xls)

East Asian Orphans

Some East Asian orphans can be identified by customer code EV.  In Summer 2010, 3,695 orphan barcodes were encoded EV.  The vast majority have dumb barcodes; only 209 have smart barcodes.

Since February 2007 East Asian general collections were accessioned with CU-prefix barcodes.  For the first several years CJK-language collections were accessioned with customer code EV.  Since they now have customer code CU, it makes the orphans indistinguishable from other departmental collections at ReCAP. 

Link to project website on East Asian Library/ReCAP website.

100- Prefix Orphans

Summer 2011 project to resolve all 100- prefix orphans.  Majority were theses and dissertations belonging to RBML.  Leftover work includes approximately 125 extramuro dissertations to be completed by MPS staff.

Documentation: Flowchart (.xlsx)

Overdue ILL/BorrowDirect

Permanent Withdrawal Report

A dynamic record of all barcodes submitted to CUL Systems staff for permanent withdrawal from ReCAP since December 2006.

Batch files for permanent withdrawal is sent to ReCAP every Wednesday. Confirmation email is sent by ReCAP staff to alias recapwdprob@libraries.cul.columbia.edu. Email confirms withdrawn barcodes and alerts about problems. Problems may be barcodes not on file, already withdrawn or currently on the shelf at ReCAP.

Reconciliation Report

Often Offsite collections are returned to ReCAP still charged to a patron, status patron or In Transit.  Each week a list of barcodes and corresponding CLIO locations is discharged by LITO staff.  This list is informally called the reconciliation report.  Items are discharged weekly from the correct happening location according to CLIO location.

Most items on the report have In Transit status.  In Transit status is added when a item is discharged from a non-owning service desk.  For more information see the Appendix section on Happening Location.

CUL staff must manually clear all charges and In Transit statuses.  If charge or status remains in place, the item will be unavailable for patron request.  Patron may incur additional fines if discharge does not occur.

How Reconciliation Report is Generated

  1. LITO staff identifies all items with a status of In Transit.  There are three such statuses: In Transit, In Transit Discharged, and In Transit on Hold
  2. From that list LITO staff removes the current week's ReCAP accessions and adds them to the Accession Report.  A list of items with status In Transit on Hold are sent to Butler Circulation staff to resolve.
  3. The barcodes on the weeded list are batch queried by LITO to determine current status.
  4. If an item status in LAS is [IN or REFILE] it is added to the reconciliation report to be discharged from the appropriate service desk.

Problems with Reconciliation

To minimize the amount of reconciliation performed by LITO, CUL circulation staff are encouraged to discharge items in the appropriate, owning happening location.  This may mean that more than one happening location needs to be used while discharging daily ReCAP returns.

GFA periodically changes item status displays in LAS.  This may break programs written by LITO with result that not all items with a current Voyager charge appear on the weekly reconciliation reports.

Example Report (abridged)

off,ave AR00560987
off,glx CU13480707
off,leh CU01615459
off,msr MR00093114
off,psy CU04441206
off,sci CU11901209
off,swx CU08180784
off,utmrl UT00011029
off,utn CR00250007
off,utp UT63969742
off,uts CU08149879

Synchronization Report

Examines the correspondence of customer code, barcode prefix and clio location.

  • All three as expected
  • Wrong barcode prefix
  • Wrong/missing clio location
  • Wrong customer code 

Asynchronicity results when:

  • Collections change ownership after accession.  Pre-1800 titles from Butler Stacks were given over to RBML during the Google Project.  off,glx was flipped to off,rbx.  Complication in shared model when "circulating" colletions are identified by customer code.
  • Accessioned with wrong barcode/customer code. 
  • Staff make errors, unaware of correct code.
AccessQuery

Report is created in Access with a query to isolate barcode prefix.

  • Create an expression Left([BARCODE],2).

Temporary Location Report

"Temp. Loc." is the abbreviation for Temporary Location used in the Voyager ITEM record.  For more information on how Temporary Locations may be changed see DCMM-505.

Temporary Locations are assigned to Offsite collections primarily to temporarily relocate on Reserve.  At the end of the semester or school year staff remove Temp. Loc. and return books to ReCAP. 

Precat (MPS) also uses temporary locations before transfer to ReCAP.  Once Precat items are accessioned at ReCAP, the Temp Loc is removed.  Newly accessioned Precat barcodes are listed in the weekly Accession Report under TEMP LOCATION and are resolved by MRP staff.

If a Temp. Loc. is mistakenly applied to Offsite collections, it blocks the appearance of the request link and prevents patrons from placing requests via CLIO.

itemrecord1
  • In this case the Temp. Loc. is mus,fol (Music Library Scores Folio) when the correct, permanent location is off,mus (Music Library Offsite).
holdingrecord1
  • The holdings record verifies that the correct location is off,mus.
cliodisplay1
  • The display in CLIO indicates that this item belongs in the Offsite collection but is on campus, "Shelved in Music Scores Folio."  There is no request button.
accessionreport1
  • In this case, the item had not been correctly resolved from the weekly Accession Report.  Once the Temp. Loc. and Temp. Type are cleared the request button will appear on the following Friday.  No further action necessary.

Procedure

A series of steps are needed to generate, refine and resolve the Temp Loc Report.

  1. Request as standard report: /m1/clioprod/anurag/reports/zack_reports/recap_temploc20110519/getinfo.zack.pl.  Report is returned a .txt file to be imported into Excel.
  2. Batch query status in LAS for all barcodes.
  3. Separate Offsite and Local Barcodes
  4. Sort the results by LAS status: IN/REF/INC, OUT, NOT ON FILE, and PWI
  5. Resolve all items that are IN, REF and INC.  There are three categories
    1. On campus CLIO Location (xxx, xxx4off or xxx,xxx) that was not cleared as part of the weekly Accession Report.  To resolve, remove both the Temp. Loc. and Temp. Type.  Flip location to off,xxx as appropriate.
    2. Reserve CLIO Location (xxx,res) that was not cleared before return to ReCAP.  Double check in Voyager and refer to department reserves.
    3. Happening Location/CLIO Location (CIRCxxx) that was applied by mistake and HSL transit CLIO Locations (xxx2hsl).  These CLIO Locations are not used as storage locations and should be removed.  Must be changed in the Voyager Circulation Module before clearing in Cataloging Module.  Procedure: a) retrieve Item by barcode, b) right click on Item Record and select "Edit Item...", c) click on "Item" tab, d) change Temp. Loc. to off,glx and e) return to Cataloging Module and clear Temp. Loc. in ITEM record.
  6. Resolve all items that are OUT. 
    1. Majority have current Reserves locations (xxx,res).  No action necessary.
    2. Non-Reserves with on campus Temp. Loc., check first for charge to patron.  If charged, clear Temp. Loc. as appropriate.  If not charged, clear Temp. Loc. and charge to RCPMISS002.
    3. CIRCrbx, RESVglx: clear Temp. Loc. and charge to RCPMISS002.
  7. Resolve all items that are NOT ON FILE
    1. Majority of these items have Temp. Loc. glx,pre and should not be adjusted. (May 2011 3,875 =  80.4%)
    2. Most local barcodes are Inactive within ITEM record with Active offsite barcode (can be deleted except for Avery)
    3. Some represent ghost ITEM records to be deleted
    4. Others are ITEMs whose offsite barcode has been orphaned
  IN/REF/INC OUT NOT ON FILE PWI
May 2011 105 1,553 4,819 0
November 2011 70 1,248 2,758 1
February 2012 32 1,606 2,141 0
May 2012 29 1,386 1,869 0
August 2012 66 1,177
2,103
0
November 2012 40 1,371
2,317
0
May 2013 165 1,368 2,316 0
August 2013 653 810 1,605 24

recap5

ReCAP User Inquiry Alias
recap@libraries.cul.columbia.edu

ReCAP Coordinator
Zack Lane
(212) 851-5621
zl2114@columbia.edu